We test one attack surface the way an attacker would.
Pick the flow you're most worried about. We test it end to end and rate what we find by severity, so you know what needs fixing first.
We test one attack surface in 4–6 days. Scope is confirmed before work begins.
Is this the right starting point?
- Best if you already know which flow worries you. Payout changes, say, or how a new seller gets verified. We go at that one and tell you what we find.
- Also right if you ran the free preview and want the full version of what it surfaced, or need a fast, contained answer before a board meeting or a launch.
What typically triggers this engagement.
- One flow keeps generating losses or complaints and nobody's tested it directly, or the free preview surfaced something worth a closer look.
- Leadership wants to see evidence before approving a fix.
Where we look.
- Every step in the flow, from the obvious path to the edge cases most reviews skip.
- The controls meant to stop it, and whether they hold under attack.
- How far the exposure reaches once the first control fails.
- What evidence proves the finding — usually a screenshot or a transaction record with a timestamp.
Deliverables.
Scoping call
We confirm the flow and environment, then agree in writing on what's off-limits.
Hands-on testing
A person runs these attack paths by hand. Scanners and forms don't catch what we're looking for.
Evidence package
Every finding is backed by what we did and what happened.
Severity ratings
We rank findings critical, high, medium, or low, so you know what to fix first.
Findings report
A written report covering what we found and what it would take to close it.
Findings call
We walk your team through the evidence and answer questions.
How an engagement unfolds.
Scope
We agree on the flow and the boundaries, in writing, before anything starts.
Test
Run the attack paths against the live system.
Prove
Every finding gets documented evidence. We don't submit a claim we can't back up.
Report
Deliver severity-rated findings and a findings call.
Boundaries and exclusions
- Single-Flow Audit covers one attack surface. If you need the whole platform tested, that's the Abuse Surface Audit.
- It finds and proves exposure. Fixing it is a separate step, usually on your side.
- This isn't a compliance audit or a certification, and it isn't a line-by-line review of your code.
- Every engagement starts with a signed scope and an authorization letter. We don't begin without one.
Common questions about this engagement.
How do we pick the flow?
During scoping, we help you name the one causing the most concern. Usually it's already generating losses or complaints — sometimes it's just a feeling something's off.
What if you find more than one issue?
We report everything we find inside the agreed scope. If the pattern points to a wider problem, we'll tell you and suggest an Abuse Surface Audit, but only when it's genuinely the right next step.
Do you need access to our systems?
We test what's realistically reachable the way an abuser would reach it — usually public and semi-public surfaces. Anything beyond that requires a signed scope and explicit authorization first.
Ready to talk it through?
A short conversation is enough to confirm whether Single-Flow Audit is the right fit.
Looking for more than Single-Flow Audit? Abuse Surface Audit is the natural next step.
Explore the Abuse Surface Audit